Although I have not needed his services in quite some time, he was the best. Joe represented me on my divorce and was top notch. He was extremely professional and always there to answer any questions I had. My case went to a court hearing and he was masterful. The end result came out quite favorably for me because of his preparation and thoroughness. Thanks again for superior representation.
Review Left On 03/01/2017
Jack Kemp
What a loser! Stay away Joseph R. Deciantis, 1890 Tamiami Trail S., Unit A, Venice, to be publicly reprimanded following a June 2 court order. (Admitted to practice: 1985) Deciantis was retained to represent clients in two separate dissolution of marriage cases and one divorce modification. In all three instances, he received thousands of dollars but neglected to provide adequate representation. Deciantis failed to diligently respond to or participate in discovery in one case and in two cases he failed to provide clients with itemized statements of charges. (Case No. SC13-1774)
Review Left On 02/29/2016
Javier Lima
He has been patient with me coming up with money to pay for his professional service. Very friendly and smart. Won a surprise demand and now winning the rest. He is the best!
Do not waste your money with this man. He doesn't follow through or finish things. He never completed my case then left me hanging when he told me he was retiring and I needed to find a new attorney and he never retired. He has been reported to the bar by several of his clients.
Leave A Review For For Joseph R De Ciantis Law Firm
Reviews
Joseph R. Deciantis, 1890 Tamiami Trail S., Unit A, Venice, to be publicly reprimanded following a June 2 court order. (Admitted to practice: 1985) Deciantis was retained to represent clients in two separate dissolution of marriage cases and one divorce modification. In all three instances, he received thousands of dollars but neglected to provide adequate representation. Deciantis failed to diligently respond to or participate in discovery in one case and in two cases he failed to provide clients with itemized statements of charges. (Case No. SC13-1774)